Value-Based Healthcare Drives “Left of Bang” Approach for Risk Management and Compliance

If it’s right for the Marine Corps, it’s right for hospitals!

By Mark Crockett, M.D., CEO, Verge Health

Mark CrockettIn 2007, the Marine Corps deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan had a problem: how to identify an enemy that blended in with the population. They developed a behavioral approach to helping teams sharpen their tactical awareness skills to remain “left of bang,” or to fend off hostile actions before they culminate in the “bang” of conflict. In 2017, healthcare needs to deploy the same approach to managing risk and improving outcomes.

Almost all of healthcare is focused on the “right of bang,” or the future correction of adverse events. Everything is oriented to logistically and financially react to a problem that has already happened. Healthcare systems across the nation are realizing the importance of adopting solutions that can collect data to analyze and pinpoint at-risk processes. This movement towards “left of bang” approaches is essential, especially as the industry pushes towards value-based care.

The goal of value-based care is to standardize healthcare processes by mining data to determine which processes are successful and which are not. This is the kind of data integration that saves money, but most importantly, re-shapes the organization into a safety first culture. The ideal result is fewer readmissions, less frequent hospitalizations or trips to the ER, and quicker, more efficient remedies to adverse events on a long-term basis.

At one Northern California-based hospital system, this issue became a matter of life and death.  Their timeline-oriented thinking – and solutions – needed to become ‘left of bang’.  The hospitals had previously implemented a Six Sigma plan to reduce central line infections in for severely ill patients who need them. Six Sigma is a popular methodology that takes a data-driven approach to eliminate defects in any process. The approach aims for six (or less) standard deviations between the mean and the nearest specification limit.

Using Six Sigma, the hospital system found a catheter that was septic superior, then worked through purchasing problems, stocking the catheter, sterilization procedures, and finally, implemented a process that ensures no one receives the catheter until the surgeon is ready.  The improvement eradicated central sepsis in five years, an amazing feat compared to industry standard.

It’s a great thing when you can eliminate sepsis in central lines. But five years later, the 44-hospital system has no means of assessing compliance with the process design developed using Six Sigma. Nor does it have the ability to transition what was learned to other facilities.

“We know how to prevent central line infections,” said one team member. “But without strong leadership, and the technology to implement the safety procedures system-wide, inertia takes over. We have an adverse event, or worse, a death, and ask ourselves ‘Where is that folder on catheter infections?’  It’s just not good enough.”

So, what’s missing?

Getting hospitals to look for patterns in identifying adverse events, and working to identify them before they occur, keeps clinicians and staff in perpetual ‘left of bang’ mode. But process improvement through Six Sigma isn’t going to enable this essential shift to a safety-first culture. Neither will the latest software, or the best management training. It’s going to take all of these approaches – and more – for healthcare to truly see the results and outcomes that payers demand from providers.

That’s why we create the Converge Platform and a process to achieve governance, risk and compliance for healthcare.


Recent Posts

Avoiding the “Bang “in Healthcare

The healthcare sector is complex by nature. Physicians aren’t necessarily employed by hospitals, so the level of internal communication needed to generate better data is often not there. Since medical errors still rank as the third leading cause of death, with roughly 10 percent of deaths in the United States due to preventable medical mistakes

Read More

Top Five Lessons from VergeCon 2018: Taking a Systems Approach to Safety

“The Project Approach is not making patients safer!” We had the opportunity recently to have a group of senior executives from health systems at our user group meeting a few weeks ago, and the progress our clients are making in keeping patients safer is incredibly encouraging.  These executives came from great health systems around the

Read More

40 Years of Learning Culture

What can healthcare learn from an airline crash, almost 40 years ago?

This December marks 40 years since the 1978 crash of United Airlines Flight 173[1]. The scheduled flight from JFK International Airport in New York City was bound for a final destination of Portland, OR. This tragic accident killed ten people while 175 survived. There were many stories about survivors, neighbors living near the crash site,

Read More